Creating NFTs has never been easier and fun!
Gregory Marcilhacy
June 25, 2025
Decentralized storage is no longer a novelty—it’s the backbone of many Web3 apps.
Yet not all protocols are cut from the same cloth. Shebly (a new “hot-storage” network backed by Aptos Labs & Jump Crypto) and IPFS (the battle-tested peer-to-peer protocol by Protocol Labs) share the same dream of a content-addressable web, but they approach it in very different ways.
Dimension | Shebly | IPFS |
---|---|---|
Primary goal | High-throughput, low-latency retrieval (“hot storage”) | Content-addressable file exchange |
Data layout | Erasure-coded chunksets < 10 MiB | Immutable content-addressable blocks up to 256 KiB |
Incentives | Mandatory paid reads + storage rewards settled on Aptos | None built-in (optional Filecoin or other layers) |
Retrieval path | Dedicated fiber backbone → RPC gateway → Storage Provider | Peer discovery via DHT → Bitswap / GraphSync |
Audit & slashing | Hybrid peer audits + on-chain proofs | Community pinning & best-effort availability |
Latency | Milliseconds (cloud-like) | Seconds or more (depends on peers) |
Replication cost | < 2× (k/n erasure coding) | User-defined—often full replicas |
Best for | 4K video, AI checkpoints, real-time analytics | Static websites, NFTs, verifiable backups |
Maturity | Testnet / white-paper stage (2025) | Production since 2015, wide ecosystem |
Layer | Shebly | IPFS |
---|---|---|
Storage | SPs stake tokens and earn capacity rewards; slashed for downtime | “Pinning” is voluntary unless paired with Filecoin or third-party pinning services |
Retrieval | Readers pay tiny micropayments per chunk | Free; performance is “best effort” |
Security | On-chain audits + slash | Social trust / optional Filecoin proofs |
Use case | Shebly | IPFS |
---|---|---|
Streaming 4K video | ✅ | ⚠️ (buffering) |
AI model checkpoints (GBs) | ✅ | ⚠️ (slow) |
NFT metadata & images | ⚠️ (overkill) | ✅ |
Static website hosting | ⚠️ | ✅ |
Big-data analytics spill | ✅ | 🚫 (block size limit) |
Immutable academic data | ✅ | ✅ |
Both protocols push the web toward a trust-minimized future, but they optimize for opposite ends of the storage spectrum.
IPFS prioritizes openness and interoperability, while Shebly bends over backward for speed and verifiable uptime—at the cost of tighter economic coupling and newer tech.
If your dApp lives or dies by read-latency (think live video or AI inference), keep an eye on Shebly’s upcoming mainnet.
For everything else, the IPFS toolbox remains a proven bet.
Stay decentralized, and choose the right tool for the job.
Browse other posts